Gadgetory

welcome back to harbor unboxed today we can finally show you what the new second gen rising processes have to offer might surprise some of you but it's already been one year since AMD first introduced their rise in cpu series does that architecture was a clean sheet frame d that's fantasy ended up being a huge success now it's time to unleash these n+ architecture on the 12 nanometer process but before we do this video has been sponsored by Squarespace whether you need a domain website or online store make it with Squarespace for more information please check the link in the video description today we have the new Rison 720 700 X and risin 520 600 processors to show you an AMD tells us that these n+ architecture offers a reduction in cache latency anywhere from 13 percent up to 34 percent an 11 percent reduction in DRAM latency IPC improvements of approximately three percent and improved memory support for greater frequencies so that all sounds good in addition to all that Global Foundries 1200p process LP for leading performance means higher frequencies and improved power consumption AMD says this new process offers transistor performance that is 10 to 15 percent better than that of the previously used process in short we're seeing a 300 megahertz increase in clock speed up to four point three gigahertz a 50 millivolt reduction in core voltage and a possible Olcott overclock of around 4.2 gigahertz so far AMD's announced for second gen rising cpus and for this review we have the X models the 9 X 26 and 2700 now available but only for biddest testing them in time for today's release so we've pre-ordered those models and we'll have a review online shortly moving on let's just quickly go over the specs I'll provide a table and screen with a bit more information but the things worth noting is that the 2700 X is an eight-course 16 thread CPU with a 3.7 gigahertz base and a 4.3 hertz max boost frequency then we have the 2600 X which is a 6 chord 12 thread CPU that operates 100 megahertz lower for the bass and boost clocks the 2700 X cost $330 u.s. and the 2600 X just 230 dollars u.s. so that means the 700x is coming in well under the 1800 x and 1700 x launch prices and in fact matches the 1700 for 2600 exits between the launch price of the 1600 x and a 1600 so AMD looks as though they're going to continue being extremely competitive on pricing those are the highlights and while there are more things that we could talk about like xf art or sense mi technology we're going to skip over that stuff for this video and just talk about the test methods used and then jump right into the results because I know that's what many of you guys are desperately wanting to see for testing the new second gen rise in the CPUs I'm using the asrock x4 70 Taichi ultimate but I've double-checked all the results with the gigabyte x4 70 or s gaming 7 as well and both motherboards did work flawlessly the memory of choice is G skills snipe 4x ddr4 3400 CL 16 and I've merely loaded the XMP profile all testing has been conducted with the Box coolers unless specified otherwise and this goes for all the CPUs benchmarked in this video and for the unlocked Intel K processors I will be using the corsair h 110 IV to the first gen rising CPUs which include the Rison 7 1800 x and verizon 5 1600 have been tested on the asrock x 370 taichi using g skills flare x ddr4 3200 cell 14 memory unfortunately i did run out of time to add more first generalise and CPUs to the results but those two parts will give us a good idea of what we're looking at in terms of gains for these second gen rising parts please note all the data has been updated for this review so that means it's all fresh it's been gathered in the past 2 weeks so I couldn't just simply carry over the 1600 X or 1700 results from previous tests they need to be retested all testing has been done with the latest drivers Windows updates motherboard BIOS updates game and application updates throughout the testing we'll be looking at stock out-of-the-box performance as well as overclocking the first gen rising CPUs have been overclocked to 4 gear Hertz while I was able to get the 2600 X stable at 4.1 yoghurts and the 2700 X at 4.2 years I should note though that getting my 2700 X stable at 4.2 geek Hertz was quite difficult hitting 4.2 gigahertz on all calls wasn't easy and it did require one point 4 volts to pass our hour-long blender stress tests for this overclock I am using the corset h 150 i pro then the 2600 X now that failed our stress test at 4.2 Hertz and this forces down a 4.1 gigahertz which was a bit disappointing perhaps though we've got a bad chip time will tell also remember nothing is guaranteed with overclocking and as I put this video together I don't actually know if these are good or bad / clocks a MIDI does suggest though that the over clocks are now in the range of four point two units but until we have more data and just take that with a grain of salt still the good news is the 2600 X was stable at 4.1 gigahertz using the Wraiths firebox cooler and I'll include temperatures at the end of the video unfortunately though as I said I did run out of time and therefore wasn't able to include as many first-generation CPUs as I would have liked to also I didn't have time to overclock the sky like X CPU so this is something I will do in a future video alright so I think that's about everything it's time to get into the benchmarks before we get into the application and gaming benchmarks here's a quick look at the memory bandwidth performance despite using the slightly faster ddr4 34-hundred memory the second gen rise and cpus are comparable to the original parts with a throughput of around 39 gigabytes per second overclocked though the memory bandwidth does remain much the same and I'll likely explore memory scaling and all that sort of stuff in greater detail in a future video here we have the cinnamon jar 15 results we do see some really nice gains please note though that we don't report the absolute best score but rather an average of 6 back-to-back runs and the 2,700 X did deliver slightly better results with an upgraded cooler but the results you're going to see here first based on the Box cooler though 2,700 X improves on the 1800 X's single thread score by 11 percent though just 8% for the multi-threaded score but that was enough to edge out the core i7 78 20x meanwhile the rosin 520 600 X does look very impressive when compared to the non X 1600 and although it only matched the single thread score of the 7800 X it was 7% faster for the multi-threaded test overclock the 2,700 X is a base to producing a multi-threaded score of 1800 and 79 points making it 7% faster on the maxed out 1800 exit 4 gigahertz it also beat the 5.2 gigahertz 8700 K by a convincing 13 percent margin the 2600 X on the other hand was a little less impressive only improving on its stock score by just 4% the horizon 720 700 X was 10 percent fast in the 1800 X for the PC mark 10 video editing test and this placed it roughly on par to 7700 K and ahead of the 78 20x and 80 600 K the 2600 X managed to match the r7 1800 X and i7 700 X though it was only slightly faster than the r5 1600 overclocked the 2700 X was 6% faster in this test while the 2600 X was just 3% faster already it is looking like overclocking the rise in 520 600 X is probably going to be a waste of time horizon 7 2700 X dominated the PC mark 10 physics benchmark with a score of twenty thousand nine hundred and eighty-five points making it once again 10 percent faster than the 1800 X this time the 2600 X was 15% faster and the 1600 which is an impressive game though of course the margin will be reduced when compared to these 1600 X model overclocked both the 2700 X and 2600 X ecat a little extra performance though in this test it's hardly anything worth getting excited over for those of you who love Excel and I personally have a love/hate relationship with Excel but my issues aside it is good news for the new rise and CP users they enable you to crunch data faster than ever without breaking the bank the 2,700 X took just two point two seconds to complete the workload while the 2600 X took 2.7 seconds overclocked the times as expected fell away and the 2,700 X was able to remain ahead of the 8700 K if only just again the 2600 X ran a somewhat boring race it was well ahead of the overclocked 8600 k but well behind the 1800 x as expected SMT is significantly more efficient for decompression work opposed to compression this means in our 7-zip tests while the 2700 X was 12% faster in the 7820 X when extracting files it was 17% slow when archiving them it's a similar story when comparing the 2600 X 7800 X overclocked the 2600 X is slightly faster but again gains are hardly worth the effort the 2700 X is more impressive as it enjoyed a 7% points bump though it was only 5% faster than the overclocked 1800 X the 2700 X is slightly sold in the core i7 8700 K an hour handbrake benchmark and quite a bit slower than the 78 20x meanwhile the 2600 X was able to match the 8600 K and it beat the 8400 placing it firmly in coffee-like core i5 territory okay so overclock the 2700 X still trails 8700 K by a reasonable margin though it was able to beat the 80 600 K then we see that overclocking the 2600 X was enough to see it just outpaced the 7700 K at five years so that's a pretty impressive result moving on to the corona benchmarks and we see that the render time for the 2700 X was just a few seconds longer than the core i7 78 20x which is a solid result for AMD then we see that the 2600 X did manage to edge out the 7800 X making for an even better result the 1800 X already had the 8700 K beat in this benchmark so the 2700 X really just makes sure of it overclocked to the 8700 K is able to match the overclocked 1800 X and this place both on par with this stock 2700 X however overclocked in the 2700 X reduced the render time by 10% down in just 108 seconds unfortunately the 2600 X was only able to improve on its time by a 2% margin at once overclocked moving on to the blender render test and here the 2700 X was just 5% fast the 1800s while the 2600 X beat for 1600 by 15% Marg and this made these second gen rise in parts slightly slow in the sky like X CPUs featuring the same amount of cause overclocked we again squeeze only slightly more performance out of these second gen rise and CPUs the render time for the 2,700 X was reduced by 7% and 5% for the 2600 X the v-ray benchmark is another free standalone application to help you test how fast your Hardware renders and of course we are focusing on the CPU results here you can see that 2700 X basically matches the 7820 X while the 2600 X was able to match the 7800 X so the second gen Rison CPUs are very competitive with Skylar X now on for some overclocking results once again and we see that the 8700 K at five point two gigahertz can't actually catch the overclocked 2700 X in fact it only manages to match the stock 2700 X meanwhile once again we say the 2600 X really is only a fraction faster once overclocked I really am keen though to overclock these 7820 X and the 7800 X and then revisit these tests again wrapping up the application testing we have Premiere Pro CC and first up we're going to check out the encoding performance here the 2700 X is only able to beat the export time of the 1800 X by 4% margin and this MANET was still nine percent slower than the 78 20x the 2600 X while that does do better against the 7800 X but it was still a little bit slower overclock though we see good gains from the second gen rise in parts but again I'll have to revisit these tests once I've had time to overclock these skylake excess CPUs we're Rison has struggled in the past is the lightly threaded workloads and coding a video generally sees all caused well utilized but most editing tasks don't necessarily use all available CPU resources the higher clock speeds of the second generalize and CPUs do really help here and here we see the 2700 X was able to reduce this workload time by 7% from the 1800 X as you can see the 2,700 X and 2600 X delivered pretty much the same result as this isn't a call heavy workload and we're pretty much just seeing an advantage of the higher clock speeds of these new risin parts overclocked we see a decent performance uplift but again the 2,700 X and 2,600 X deliver similar results still you can't help but notice how much faster the 8700 K is for these sorts of workloads when compared to the 2,700 X the 8700 K reduced the completion time by 19% even at 5 gigahertz you can still expect it to be around 15% faster alright time to move on to some games and for those of you hoping to see vastly improved gaming performance you're probably going to be a bit disappointed though there are some decent results here so just wait until we get to the hosts for ashes of the singularity the 2,700 X only matched the 1800 X while the 2600 X was a good bit faster than the 1600 overclocking did little for the 2600 X while the 2700 enjoy a decent performance uplift nothing extreme but it did overtake the overclocked 7700 K and 8600 K processors moving on to Assassin's Creed origins and here we have a few noteworthy things to discuss firstly we are GPU bound and even with the GTX 1080 at 1080p the ultra quality settings are very demanding still the KB lake and coffee-like CPUs beat the Rison 7 1800 X with ease and sadly the 2nd gen CPUs aren't really much faster than the 1800 X however it is worth knowing they do still match the sky like experts in this game and you will see a bit more of this as we look at other titles basically this comes down to how the cores are connected and while extremely efficient for connecting up to 10 cores Intel's ring bus method that's used for the KB Lake and coffee like CPUs and pretty much all their mainstream our CPUs doesn't seem to scale that efficiently beyond say 10 cores and this is where intel's mesh interconnect will take over i'll discuss this a little bit more later in the video but for now let's check out assassin's creed again with a lower quality preset dropping down to the higher quality preset doesn't change much and we again see very similar performance trends the 2700 x and 2600 x deliver basically the same results and again while on par with the Scarlet x parts they are quite a bit slower than the kb lake and coffee-like cpus overclocking once again doesn't really help the bottleneck here doesn't appear to be frequency at the 2nd gen rising cpus also aren't able to improve on the performance we saw from the 1800 X which is disappointing to see moving on the battlefield 1 and here we see very similar results between the 2700 X and 2600 X just 2 to 3 FPS separate the two performance II is very competitive though the 8700 K completely walks away with the 1% low result hitting a hundred and twenty FPS overclocked we say reasonable gains from the 2700 X but again it does trail the GPU limited kb lake and coffee-like cpus in an effort to remove or at the very least reduce the GPU bottleneck i've dropped down to the medium quality preset with battlefield 1 here we see the 2700 X and 2600 X again deliver very similar results as battlefield one doesn't require 16 threads 12 threads will happily get the job done the 2,700 X still trailed the 8700 K by an 18 percent margin and the 8600 k by a 10% margin again overclocking doesn't really help that much the 2700 X or the average frame rate increased by just 5% and that was enough to match the stock 7700 K meanwhile the 8700 K was 24% faster next up we have far cry and again the 2700 X is only slightly faster than the 2600 X though it does offer a noteworthy step forward from the 1800 X the 2700 X was roughly 10% fast in the 1800 X which really isn't that bad fact that's actually quite good overclocking helps squeeze out a few more frames but the gains were even better with the cable a canned coffee like CPUs this means the 87 or okay is now a 21% faster for example our overwatch bot benchmark is very CPU intensive but there are a few problems here and one of them is that we are artificially GPU limited as the game has a 300 FPS frame cap that said you'd expect the average frame rate to be much closer to the frame cap than it is before the bots engage one another though we are locked at 300 FPS but once they come together the frame rates on all CPUs drop down closer to 200 fps I'm not quite sure what this limit is it could have something to do with the game engine I haven't used overwatch to test high-end CPUs for a while now it was great for comparing two four and six core CPUs but with today's high-end CPUs we send you pushing the game to its limits here we see at the horizon 720 700 X is fast enough to reach the limit and therefore it's able to roughly match the Intel CPUs because of this apparent limit the 2700 X doesn't gain much from overclocking in this test and the 2600 X doesn't typically gain much from overclocking anyway from what we've seen so again we see that again here Warhammer vermintide 2 was slow with the GTX 1080 on all the tested CPUs when using DirectX 12 so I removed those results and stuck with DirectX 11 exclusively at Tony P we're hitting the limits with the GTX 1082 are using the extreme quality settings and this sees the 2700 X basically match the IE 700 K and here at trails the Intel CPUs by 2 to 3 frames per second overclocking does provide a few extra frames here and there but because we're mostly GPU limited the gains are small wrapping up the game benchmarks we have vermintide to using the medium quality settings and here 2700 X wasn't nine percent fast in the 1800 X while the 2600 X was 13% faster than the 1600 although the 2700 X was 10% slow in the 80s 700 K it was 16% fast in the 78 20x and that's a very interesting result overclocked we do see small gains from the second gen rise in CPUs and again overclock in the 2600 X looks to be pretty much a waste of time and I'll discuss that more when looking at the power consumption figures which we'll do now looking at power consumption when testing with ash of the singularity we see at the 2700 X only increases the total system consumption by four percent when compared to the 2600 X it also only used two percent more than the 8700 K now the core i7 8720 X looks pretty bad here using fifteen percent more power than the 2700 X but remember it was 14% faster as well so performance per watt is actually much the same in this title overclocking only increase the power draw of the second gen rise in CPUs by a small margin six percent for the 2,700 X for example the 8700 case or total system consumption increased by 18 percent making it less efficient once overclocked the 2700 X and 2600 X will once again consumed a very similar amount of power this time when testing with far cry 5 they were basically on part with the 8700 K but did use less than the sky like X parts so in this total a second gen rising CPUs were much more efficient than these 7820 X and 7800 X overclocking again didn't have a huge impact on power draw for the second gen rise and CPUs well it did see the KB lake and coffee-like CPUs eat up loads more power for our blender workload the 2600 X consume roughly the same amount of power as the 87 okay while the 2,700 X was on part with these 7800 X overclocked the second gen rise and CPUs consumed around 20% more power which is a lot better than the almost 60% increase seeing when overclocked in the 8700 K interestingly the 2,700 X was just 6% fast in the 1800 X in handbrake and yet we see here it does consume 15% more power in fact the 2600 X matched the power consumption of the 1800 X which was very surprising the 2700 X also push system consumption 9 percent higher than the 1800 X when we looked at the encode performance in premiere Pro and it only reduced the encode time by four percent interestingly though the 2600 X consumed just 10% more power than the 1600 but it was able to reduce the encode time by 16% in terms of performance per what the second generation CPUs will comparable to the skylake x78 20x and 7800 x in this application using the provided box cooler I tested out how the horizon 520 600 X got on and with the race Speier found very reasonable temperatures out of the box gaming you'd expect temperatures to hover between 50 and 60 degrees assuming you have a well ventilated case that is it's well worth noting though that the fan was very quiet throughout our testing overclocking had little impact on temperatures when gaming however we did see a massive increase for the heavy blender workload and after an hour the CPU did peak at 90 degrees which is certainly getting up there now the 2700 X gets the fancy new wraith prison cooler and while more substantial than the spire temperatures did climb higher when paired with the eight core CPU out of the box the prism allowed the 2700 X 2 hits 64 degrees in our game test and 92 degrees if the blender stress test that being the case the prison couldn't handle are 4.2 gigahertz overclock and gaming wasn't too bad but the max temperature when using the blender stress tests or thermals reach their limit and this would often cause crashes strapping on the corsair h 150 i pro solved these issues and reduced the blender load temp down to 81 degrees which is very reasonable gaming temperatures also drop down below 6 degrees as well so overclockers will want to upgrade the cooler and I will explore more cost-effective options in a future video while on the subject of coolers as I said the stock 2700 X testing was done with the Wraith prism box cooler and all overclocking was conducted using the corsair h1 50 I Pro running our blender stress test the 2700 exhaled a clock speed of 3.8 gigahertz on all cores and then upgrading to the H 150 I pro increased that frequency to 3.9 gigahertz and this improves the render time by less than a percent so not a big deal there but it does suggest that those overclocking will want to upgrade the cooler and will explore more options in a future video before wrapping up the testing there are a few more benchmarks I wanted to squeeze in now these next few graphs compare the rise in seven 2700 X and rise in seven 1800 x o'clock four o'clock at four gigahertz on these same X 470 motherboard using the same memory and timings interestingly whereas we haven't be able to get the 1800 X working with memory higher than ddr4 3200 on rx 370 boards it did work all the way up to ddr4 3600 on the X 470 boards firing up Cinebench r15 we set the memory frequency has little impact on this test that said we do see AMD's claim of an approximate three percent increase due to IPC gains is spot on at the same frequency the 2700 X was up to three percent faster though for the most part we saw gains around the two percent mark still that's better than nothing he said as he gazed over to his coffee like CPU then he's KB like CPU and then finally he's skylake cpu interestingly the difference between g.skill sniper X ddr4 3400 cell 16 and ddr4 3600 sound nineteen memory is virtually non-existent the elusive timings of the higher clocked memory pretty much nullifies any advantage the higher frequency might bring although we only saw a two to three percent improvement with these Cinebench r15 results here we see the 2700 x shaving seven percent off the render time of course the improved cache performance could also be helping here but it's great to see the second gen rising CPU offering such a noteworthy improvement where match clock for clock finally we have battlefield 1 and here you can see that AMD has made great strides the 2700 X was 5 to 6 percent fast when comparing the 1 percent low data and 7 percent faster on average granted those are just single figure gains but that is going to help rise and do battle with the coffee like CPUs in gaming benchmarks as we've already seen remember we're testing with a GTX 10 atti at 1080 P using medium quality settings here rising now has a much better chance of finding the limits of your graphics card under more realistic gaming conditions despite the fact that we're almost 4000 words and well over 50 graphs deep into this review I still feel like there's much more than I want to cover here and nevertheless though I have covered all the essentials for this review and it should give you a good idea of how the horizon 720 700 X and Rison 520 600 X compared to the current generation Intel CPUs as was the case with the first generation parts AMD offers seriously strong performance in core heavy productivity workloads stock at overclocked to the 2700 X beats the 8700 K and most workloads though there are times where the higher clocked coffee-like CPU will still pull ahead it's fair to say they trade blows the 2700 X did have the advantage of slightly higher clocked memory in these tests but I have quickly gone back and checked a few of the benchmarks with the 8700 k using ddr4 3400 memory and the gains are extremely small sometimes even non-existent also remember the 3200 memory operates at tighter timings I also realized that the 8700 K at five point two years is without question showing a best-case scenario for Intel but that's kind of the point in a lot of the gaming benchmarks we see the 2700 X clocked at 4.2 gigahertz which I also feel as a best-case scenario for AMD we see that the second-generation rise in CPU does struggle to hang with even these stock 7700 K the low latency ring bus really is king for games and this is going to continue to be a problem for AMD until intel's forced to use the mesh in to connect architecture once games call for significantly more cause but don't hold your breath on that one I'm not actually saying that it won't happen because it absolutely will happen I'm just saying it might not happen as soon as I am they are hoping for but let's hope that's not the case because it would mean better games for all of us here's a quick look at some averages across the games tested at any pair using various quality settings with the gtx 980ti here the 2700 X and 2600 X look very competitive though we are only seeing a 7% improvement for the 1% low performance for the 2700 X over the 1,800 X and even less when looking at the average frame rate still it's well worth noting that the 2700 X did manage to edge at these 78 20x and this is a pretty big deal overclocking the second gen rise and cpus led to small gains and the 2700 X was really only able to keep pace with this stock 7700 K though it has to be said the 77 ok is a particularly good gaming CPU for 2700 X was also only 4% fast in the 80 600 K and 10% styled nearly 700 K which is a good result for AMD again in a lot of these tests we are GPU bound we're also using a GTX 1082 at 1080p so it's hardly extreme GPU bottlenecking power consumption was really all over the place in some workloads the 2700 X only used slightly more than the 1800 X while in others it used quite a bit more still what's key to note here is that the second gen rising CPUs were at least on par with the sky like x-series in terms of performance per watt and we're often a little better I should note that the horizon 5 1600 and rise in 7 1800 X performed the same on both the be 350 X 370 and X 470 motherboards but memory support did appear better on the X 470 board this is something I will have to look into a bit more in a future video I did also have a few stability problems with the 2nd gen rising CPUs on the 300 series boards but that could just be something as simple as a BIOS issue again I'll have to look into this in a future video in short I was limited to ddr4 3066 which does sound a bit odd surely this is just an issue with the Azeroth board I used for testing again as it stands not a lot has changed to you if you're primarily using your PC for gaming and you see high frame rates with a high refresh rate display then the Intel coffee-like Core i5 and core i7 processors do offer the best experience of course you will need to be happy with upgrading your platform every few years but I suspect those dumping loads of money on a core i7 with a top notch said 370 motherboard with cooling a match probably our having said that in a number of modern titles these six and eight call Verizon CPUs are capable of delivering a great gaming experience even on a 144 Hertz display moreover if you're going to be using a GTX 1080 or in particular a gtx 1070 or slower then the difference between those CPUs is going to be almost impossible to spot in modern titles then for applications as I noticed earlier the 2700 X stacks up very well against the mighty 8700 K and you can really go either way there however the 2600 X well that thing basically crushes the 8600 K and by extension all coffee like core i5 CPUs when compared to the 82nd okay you are looking up to 40% more processing power out of the box of course I am talking about core heavy workloads here there are instances where the 8600 Kade pull ahead though when it does it is only by a few percent so as I said earlier not a lot has changed here as expected the second generation rise and CPUs are a little better at everything when it compared to the first generation ships and well that's obviously a good thing I already preferred the horizon 5 1602 the core i5 8400 I just felt that Rison was a better all-rounder and now well I prefer the 2600 x2 any of the coffee-like core i5 parts unless as I said earlier you're doing nothing but gaming on a high refresh rate monitor with a high-end graphics card again though as an all-rounder I feel that the 2600 X is a better option moving on to the topic of overclocking when compared to the coffee like CPUs the second gen rise and CPUs are a lot less exciting however I think it has to be said that they are a lot more practical as well you can overclock all cores on the 2600 x2 4.1 gigahertz using the Box cooler meanwhile the 2700 X will also do 4.1 gigahertz using a basic air cooler I'm not 100% sure what kind of overclock can go to the Box cooler this is something I will have to do a bit more testing on to work out but the point here is you can expect reasonable temperatures without having to spend big bucks on cooling without resorting to deal inning and mega cooling the KT 700 K is really only good for a 5 gigahertz at best so keep that in mind still it is worth noting that you will only see a few percent drop in performance from 5.2 year hurts down to 5 gigahertz helping the second gen rise and CPUs along other new X 470 motherboards I really wasn't sure what to expect here I thought that the boards would just be exactly the same as the X 370 boards but the as rockin gigabyte boards that I have in hand haven't just been a rock-solid they've been absolutely fantastic with higher clock to memory overall a solid upgrade package here from AMD and if things weren't already competitive in the CPU market they are now and 2018 is shaping up to be one of the best years in recent history Verizon got off to a bit of a rough start you could say this time last year but I'm happy to report the second generation CPUs have just gone off without a hitch and AMD looks as though they're going to be in great shape this year talking of things that are in great shape check out squarespace's all-in-one platform it allows you to quickly and easily create beautiful hassle-free websites there's nothing to install patch or upgrade ever you don't need to know a thing about coding either PHP CSS HTML they're all just acronyms for things you don't need to worry about if you build with Squarespace they're beautiful designer templates make creating a powerful online identity easy each template is a starting point for a wide range of projects whether you're pursuing a side hustle or promoting your main gig and Squarespace provides award-winning 24/7 customer support so you go to squarespace.com forward slash harbor unbox that's a single word no space and start your free trial today and receive 10% off your first purchase of a website or a domain and that is going to do it for this one I've loads more 2nd gen rise and testing in coming so stay tuned for that if you did enjoy the video then be sure to eat the like button subscribe for more content if you appreciate the work we do her to have our own box then consider supporting us on patreon thanks for watching I'm your host Dave see you next time